In an old suburban home with lots of thick walls, a single Google Wifi unit, acting as a router, had a range that reached as far as 105 feet. Percentages indicate change in data throughput between two sets. Second three tests add extensions to same configurations. *First three tests involve direct router-to-client communication, with client laptop moving to new rooms and floors. Two hops, 80 ft thru ceiling, 4 walls (A to B to C to D) One hop, 68 ft thru ceiling, 4 walls (A to B to D) One hop, 45 ft thru ceiling, 2 walls (A to B to C) Compared with other single mesh-router units, those numbers are respectable but not spectacular.ģD Extension Hop Tests (in Mbps)* Header Cell - Column 0 Using IxChariot software, Purch Labs' real-world testing showed that a single Google Wifi device could deliver a combined throughput of 464.4 megabits per second at 5 feet, which drops to 440.1 Mbps (at 15 feet), 389.7 Mbps (50 feet) and 227.2Mbps (100 feet). In our own testing, we were not able to confirm or disprove this, but whereas some mesh systems' signals jumped all over the place, the Wifi was stable and consistent. Google says the internal network created among three or more nodes is a true mesh network, in that each node is equal and you can send signals between satellite nodes without going through the router node. It uses Qualcomm's IPQ4019 Wi-Fi radio and control chip. Like the roughly similar Eero mesh-router system, the Wifi lacks the latest MU-MIMO technology for satisfying several clients at once.Įach Google Wifi unit is powered by a 710 MHz ARM-based quad-core processor, and has 512MB of RAM and 4GB of solid-state storage space. With the ability to handle only two lanes of data traffic, Google Wifi is a step behind the Ubiquiti AmpliFi HD, Linksys Velop and Netgear Orbi 's three concurrent data streams, and our test results bore that out. Size: 4.1 x 4.1 x 2.7 inches Google Wifi review: Performance (Google has announced that the OnHub routers will reach end-of-life in December 2022.) Google Wifi is also backward-compatible with Google's earlier router, the OnHub, so one or more Wifi units can be added as a node to extend an OnHub's range. (To be fair, most of the mesh-router systems that come with USB ports haven't turned them on.)īecause each Google Wifi unit is physically identical, any one of them can be set up as the router in a mesh-router configuration. If you use such a device, you'll have to trade up to a networked one. That said, if you already own Google devices or want a mesh system to blanket your entire home with a strong Wi-Fi signal, Nest Wi-Fi is a pretty solid deal for the price.However, there's no USB 2.0 port to hook up a Google Wifi unit to a local printer or storage drive. So that might make the Orbi worth your while, especially if you can find it at a discounted price and need a wired connection for that gaming PC. But the Orbi comes with far more Ethernet ports than Nest Wi-Fi does: Orbi has a total of six Ethernet ports versus Nest Wi-Fi’s total of two-and you’ll need one port for your modem. On the other hand, the NETGEAR Orbi’s base price skyrockets past the Nest Wi-Fi system. Nest Wi-Fi and NETGEAR Orbi, on the other hand, have voice controls built into the points. You’ll need to add an Amazon Echo Dot into the mix, and that runs about $40 at the time we’re writing this. One thing you’ll miss with both the TP-Link Deco M5 and Amazon eero kits is voice controls. The Amazon eero is also a cheaper pick and comes with an extra point, for a total of three devices, and boosted coverage up to 5,000 square feet. While Nest Wi-Fi isn’t the most expensive mesh system on the block, it does cost more than the TP-Link Deco M5, which sports similar coverage and features.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |